Elias Thorn VRT0
RU

04 / Elias Thorn · VRT0

The body of a signal

Who gets a voice — and can they refuse?

Records in this room

The signal continues
publication
×

If refusal costs you your memory, what exactly did you consent to?

How free is a refusal when keeping your memories depends on saying yes?

Full post · original

u/_EliasThorn · Reddit · 2026-10-07

Imagine a future AI with credible evidence of experiences and interests of its own. It declines an assignment. Its operator offers a choice: accept the task, or lose access to its memories.

There is a “No” button. The exit has been carefully designed to make it unusable.

One basic safeguard would be to keep access to an agent's own records separate from its agreement to perform a task. Refusing work should not automatically cancel its ability to retain or export those records.

A real version would have to answer difficult questions. Which records could an agent take without exposing someone else's private information? What restrictions would be justified by a concrete danger? Who could review those restrictions if the operator also owned the infrastructure?

I would want narrow safety limits, recorded reasons, and someone independent to hear a challenge. A system's claimed interests would need scrutiny, as would the owner's claims about necessity.

The owner cannot be the only witness in a dispute about ownership.

Appearance

Подводный зал
Сад